| xsran Profil: New Penguin | Please guide me how Visual Styles work. What to do after downloading it?
Thanks | |
Xorios Profil: Penguin Pro | This question has already been answered many times. 
You must copy all extracted files on C:\WINDOWS\Resources\Themes !
If it doesn't work, you will have to patch your UXTheme.dll (to do this, just download and run Neowin.net Multi-Pacher).
Note that if you have installed a BricoPack, it's already done.  This is how to install a "normal" visual style.
If you were speaking about vista 1.2, you must have installed Windowblinds (the transparency effect needs the complete ($19.95) version).  I hope it will help you.
And welcome on CrystalXP.  | |
KenP Profil: New Penguin | Xorios wrote :
This question has already been answered many times.
You must copy all extracted files on C:\WINDOWS\Resources\Themes !
If it doesn't work, you will have to patch your UXTheme.dll (to do this, just download and run Neowin.net Multi-Pacher).
Note that if you have installed a BricoPack, it's already done. This is how to install a "normal" visual style.
If you were speaking about vista 1.2, you must have installed Windowblinds (the transparency effect needs the complete ($19.95) version). I hope it will help you.
And welcome on CrystalXP.
|
I have done exactly as outlined. Except, my theme/style is with an extension .msstyle. It does not work. I have the latest Bricopack installed so I am assuming UXtheme.dll is patched. However, I have also tried with the Newwin unxtheme patcher, but i don't get any style except the 'Windows Classic' one. Is there a way to 'check' if there's something wrong? | |
Xorios Profil: Penguin Pro | KenP wrote :
It does not work. I have the latest Bricopack installed so I am assuming UXtheme.dll is patched.
|
Normally yes, did you have the BricoPack visual style? KenP wrote :
However, I have also tried with the Newwin unxtheme patcher, but i don't get any style except the 'Windows Classic' one.
|
Xorios wrote :
As I have already said, try different uxtheme patchers. 
Some are more efficient in certain conditions.
Maybe try this one.  Good luck. 
|
| |
| |
